Query by Scorpiion brother
salam bro,
thanks for your swift and elaborate reply...
sorry to say....BUT...you have failed to provide direct hadiths....
furthermore...your conclusions are derived from assumption rather than straight forward stuff...
your very long explanation largely consisted about the obedience to the Holy Porphet(sawa) and the Holy Imams(as)....but you havent provided a single hadith from them. dear bro, apart from assumptions; if you DONOT have any hadiths to provide, then atleast post any ruling of our marja and ayatollahs...who i beleive are very knowledgeable. As far as grand ayatollah sistaani is concerned... i donot think its wise to put him in dim light without proving yourself....but if you are an ayatollah yourself then its a different story...furthermore, i donot think you do TAQLEED.....correct me if i'm wrong and let me know which ayatollah do you follow....
khudahafiz
Clarification submitted by me (Tabarayi)
<o:p></o:p><o:p></o:p>Salam alai kum, Ya Ali(a.s.) madad,
Dear bro scorpiion, I once again mentioning the reference may please be seen Furooh – e – Kafi volume 5, Bihar – Al – Anwar, Ad – Damatus – Sakiba by Agha Baqar Dahdashti Bahbani Najfi (ra) Volume 2, page 544 Urdu and Rasoom – Ush – Sharayya Fi Mizan Asharayya by Mohammed Hasnain Sabqi Najfi (ra) etc. Secondly if you consider Shia as superior than non Shias, which has been recorded even in Sunni Books I give here a reference of Sunni commentrator Muhammad bin Ali narrates in Tafsir ibne Jarir, Volume 33 page 146 (Cairo edition) that the Prophet (saww) said: "The best of creations are you Ali and your Shi'as". so when the non shias admits that shias are superior then no more explanation required on this issue. And the issue of Kuff is clear in the Verses and also in the traditions. And for wife her husband is her "Kafeel" ( Kafeel = sponsor, guardian, a person who leads, a person who take care in all aspect, who takes decission for, etc.) and this is also the rule by the god that "Mafzool" will not be a kafeel to "Afzal". Inshallah I will try to convince you with more references if with this too you have not convinced. Now to you another question regarding Whether I do Taqleed or Not, and if so of which Ayethullah? Brother how could I deny Taqleed and become a "Kafir", no, "Taqleed" is unavoidable (lazim) "Wajib" is different and "Lazim" is quite different such as "Furu-e-Deen" are Wajib, and "Usool-e-Deen" are Lazim, among the "Furu-e-Deen" the top one is "Namaz" which is "Wajib" but it is after attaining to the age of "baligh" otherwise it is "sakith", for women few days "sakith", it is sakith when you are in journey, it is also sakith upon a metally disabled person, etc. But the lazim is Usool-e-Deen, on any moment any situation any circumstances it can not be omited (sakith), I think here I could described a little bit the difference between "Wajib" and "Lazim", and I am sure you may be knowing more and more on this issue, please do not think otherwise, as here it requires so I did. And brother I do Taqleed of "Ayethullah" Now we will see who are the "Ayethullahs" The meaning of this word is "Sign of Allah" and many a times in the 6666 Verses of Quran this word has come for an example (1) <a title="" name="-1">Al-Baqara <2:252> Arabi :Tilka ayatu Allahi natlooha AAalayka bialhaqqi wainnaka lamina almursaleena 2:252 These are the SIGNS OF ALLAH. we rehearse them to thee in truth: verily Thou art one of the apostles. (2) Min qablu hudan lilnnasi waanzala alfurqana inna allatheena kafaroo biayati Allahi lahum AAathabun shadeedun waAllahu AAazeezun thoo intiqami 3:4 Then those who reject Faith in the SIGNS OF ALLAH will suffer the severest penalty, and Allah is Exalted in Might, Lord of Retribution. (3) Inna allatheena yakfuroona biayati Allahi wayaqtuloona alnnabiyyeena bighayri haqqin wayaqtuloona allatheena yamuroona bialqisti mina alnnasi fabashshirhum biAAathabin aleemin 3:21 As to those who deny the SIGNS OF ALLAH and in defiance of right, slay the prophets, and slay those who teach just dealing with mankind, announce to them a grievous penalty. (4) Ya ahla alkitabi <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">lima</st1:City></st1:place> takfuroona biayati Allahi waantum tashhadoona 3:70 Ye People of the Book! Why reject ye the SIGNS OF ALLAH, of which ye are (Yourselves) witnesses? (5) Alam tara ila allatheena yujadiloona fee ayati Allahi anna yusrafoona40:69 Seest thou not those that dispute concerning the SIGNS OF ALLAH. How are they turned away (from Reality)?- So brother now whom do you consider as ayethullahs, infallibles or fallibles. And one thing is clear infallibles are only 14, and more over we see in “Manla yazarul Faqi by Shaik-e-Sadooq Vol.II a tradition of Imam-e-Jafer-e-Sadiq (a.s.) “NAHNO AYETHULLAH†and in the same book you will find that among 14 infallibles only Moula Ali(a.s.) is Ayethullah-ul-Uzmah. So I do taqleed of infallible Ayethullah of this period. And particularly if you concentrate on this verse of 3:70 Ye People of the Book! Why reject ye the SIGNS OF ALLAH, of which ye are (Yourselves) witnesses? You can easily understand that during the era of souls (Aalem-e-Arva) whom we witnesses. More over there are many verses where we have been asked not to follow those who are fallibles. Please see Sura-e-Furqaan.<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
ØØ¯Ù‘ثنا عبد الله بن Ù…ØÙ…ّد بن عبد الوهاب، قال: ØØ¯Ù‘ثنا ØÙ…ّاد بن يزيد، عن أيّوب عن عطاء، عن ابن عبّاس، قال: قال رسول الله صلّى الله عليه وآلها:
ØØ¨Ù‘ عليّ بن أبي طالب يأكل السيّئات كما تأكل النار "
Refer to al-Manaqib; Ibn Shahrashoub 3:198, Maqssad ur-Raghib; 3 (manuscript), as-Sirat ul-Mustaqeem; 1:198, Taawil ul-Aayat; 827. In his kenz ul-Ummal; al-Muttaqi al-Hindi records a similar narration, which is also recorded in Thakhaair ul-Uqba; 91, Kifayat ul-Talib; 184-5. They all related the narration to Ibn Abbas and Meaath.