It is well known to every body that Maviya ibn-e-Hinda (la) and Yazeed ibn-e-Maviya (l.a) are the fouth and fifth khalifas of Palestinians. Palestine is the only country where these two bastards are considered as 4th and 5th qalihas after othman (l.a) as third. Let us see what are the opinions of the sunni ollema about this bastard Yazid (l.a)
Abdul Mughith Hanbali has the unique distinction of being one of the earliest known biographers of Yazid .Ibn Kathir said about Abdu l-Mughith that, “He was from the righteous Hanbali’s who the common folk referred to.â€Abdul Mugheeth was also not in favor of cursing Yazid or declaring him to be a disbeliever, rather he authored a biography of Yazid with the titles Fadhal Yazid and Fadhal Yazid bin Muawiyah: Hidaayatul A’arifin Asma' al-Mu’allifeen Wa Athar Musannifin (5/623), al-Bidayah Wan-Nihaayah (12/328)
After he left Qazwain he went to Baghdad where he became a teacher in Madrassa Nizamia and he would admonish and deliver lectures to the people. So on the day of Ashuraa he sat on the minbar to admonish the people, it was said to him to curse Yazid bin Muawiyah. He replied, “He was but an Imam Mujtahid. : al-Bidaayah Wan-Nihaayah (9/13), Risaalah al-Mustarfah Lee-Bayaan Mashoor Kitaab as-Sunnah al-Musharfah (pg.132)
Ibn Salah was also not in favor of cursing Yazid or saying he was a disbeliever. Ibn Hajr the Meccan writes “Ibn Salah who is from our jurists and scholars of Hadith, I have seen in his Fatwa that when he was asked concerning the individual who would only curse Yazid because he ordered the death of Husayn. Then in answer to this he said, according to us Yazid ordering the death of Hussain is not a correct report and cursing and abusing Yazid is not the sign of a believer.â€- (as-Sawaa’iq al-Meharqah (pg.222))
Ibn Taymiyyah was neither in favor of cursing Yazid nor declaring him to be a disbeliever.{{quote“And the people who curse Yazid and other such people like him then it is upon them to bring evidence, Firstly: that he was an open sinner and an oppressor and therefore prove he really was an open sinner and an oppressor as allowing him to be cursed needs to be proven that he continued this open sinning and oppression to the end up until his death. Secondly: Then after this they must prove that it is permissible to curse specific people like Yazid. ... and the verse, "May the Curse of God be upon the oppressors" is a general verse like the verses concerning punishment... And the Hadith compiled by Bukhari first army to wage Jihad against Constantinople is forgiven and it is clear that their commander Yazid ibn Muawiyah was a member of this army and is included in this forgiveness.}} - (ref books: Minhaaj as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah Fee Naqdh Kalaam ash-Shee’ah Wal-Qadariyyah (2/252), al-Muntaqa al-Minhaj al-I’tidaal fi Naqdh Kalaam ar-Rafdh wa l-i’tizaal (pg.290). states the
Sunnis are not in favour of cursing the bastard Yazid (l.a) and now we see the Known to be shia are supporting to the followers of Yazeed (l.a) It meas no one have the pain for the tragedey of "karbala"? Allaho akber But I curse Not only the bastard Yazid but also those who supports Yazeed (l.a) and also to those who are supporting to the supporters of Yazeed (l.a)
